ASSESSING FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL MENISCECTOMY IN MIDDLE-AGED ADULTS WITH MENISCAL TEARS

SA RAHIM; ME ASHRAF

doi:10.54112/pjicm.v5i02.148

Authors

SA RAHIM Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, Pakistan
ME ASHRAF Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i02.148

Keywords:

Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy, Meniscal Tear, Middle-Aged Adults, Functional Outcomes, Lysholm Knee Score, Degenerative Tear

Abstract

Background: Meniscal tears are a frequent cause of knee pain and disability in middle-aged adults. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is widely performed, yet its functional outcomes in this age group remain debated. Local evidence is essential to optimize treatment selection and patient counseling. Objective: To determine the functional outcome of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in middle-aged adults with meniscal tears. Study Design: Descriptive study. Setting: The Orthopedic Surgery Department of Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan. Duration of Study: 27-Nov-2024 to 27-May-2025. Methods: A total of 87 patients aged 40–70 years with symptomatic meniscal tears were included. All patients underwent standardized arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Functional outcomes were assessed 12 weeks postoperatively using the Lysholm knee scoring scale and categorized as excellent (95–100), good (84–94), fair (65–83), or poor (<65). Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD, frequencies, percentages) were computed using SPSS 25. Results: The mean age of participants was 54.31 ± 8.67 years, with a slight male predominance (56.3%). Degenerative tears were more common (71.3%) compared to traumatic tears (28.7%). Postoperative functional outcomes were excellent in 33 (37.9%) patients, good in 31 (35.6%), fair in 21 (24.1%), and poor in 2 (2.3%). Conclusion: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy demonstrated favorable short-term functional outcomes in middle-aged adults with meniscal tears, with nearly three-quarters achieving good-to-excellent results. Careful patient selection remains key, particularly in degenerative cases.

References

Bland-Sutton J. Ligaments: their nature and morphology. London: H.K. Lewis; 1887. [No DOI found].

Pasiński M, Zabrzyńska M, Adamczyk M, Sokołowski M, Głos T, Ziejka M, et al. A current insight into human knee menisci. Transl Res Anat. 2023;32:100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2023.100259

Nochehdehi AR, Nemavhola F, Thomas S. Structure, function, and biomechanics of meniscus cartilage. In: Cartilage Tissue of the Knee Joint: Biomechanics. Elsevier; 2024. p. 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90597-8.00020-7

Beaufils P, Pujol N. Management of traumatic meniscal tear and degenerative meniscal lesions: save the meniscus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(8):237–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.003

Moreno-Garcia A, Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Orthobiologics: current role in orthopedic surgery and traumatology. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022;10(7):536–42. https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2021.52770.2614

Chambers HG, Chambers RC. The natural history of meniscus tears. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(Suppl 1):S53–S55. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001386

Jarraya M, Roemer FW, Englund M, Crema MD, Gale HI, Hayashi D, et al. Meniscus morphology: does tear type matter? A narrative review with focus on relevance for osteoarthritis research. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;46(5):552–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.11.005

Avila A, Vasavada K, Shankar DS, Petrera M, Jazrawi LM, Strauss EJ. Current controversies in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022;15(5):336–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-022-09770-7

Noorduyn JC, van de Graaf VA, Willigenburg NW, Scholten-Peeters GG, Kret EJ, van Dijk RA, et al. Effect of physical therapy vs arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in people with degenerative meniscal tears: five-year follow-up of the ESCAPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2220394. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20394

Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Itälä A, Joukainen A, Kalske J, et al. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for a degenerative meniscus tear: 5-year follow-up of the placebo-surgery controlled FIDELITY trial. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(22):1332–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102813

Hall MJ, Schwartzman A, Zhang J, Liu X. Ambulatory surgery data from hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers: United States, 2010. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2017;(102):1–15.

Hussein A, Mcharo C, Mwanga J, Mrita F, Sabas J, Zakariyya J, et al. Short-term functional outcomes of partial meniscectomy among middle-aged patients in Tanzania. East Afr Orthop J. 2023;17(2):77–84.

Joshi A, Sable AS, Usman S, Sabnis B, Sane P, Bagaria V. Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy at 10 years follow-up: a retrospective cohort study. J Arthrosc Surg Sports Med. 2024;5(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.25259/JASSM_9_2024

Husain A, Ahmad S, Khan F. Short-term functional outcomes of partial meniscectomy among middle-aged patients. Adv Basic Med Sci. 2025;9(1):03–08. https://doi.org/10.35845/abms.2025.1.370

Burki AU, Bajwa MA, Bajwa MA, Pervaiz HK, Amin S, Arsalan S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for chronic meniscal tears. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2019;69(5):1129–33.

Migliorini F, Oliva F, Eschweiler J, Cuozzo F, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N. No evidence in support of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in adults with degenerative and nonobstructive meniscal symptoms: a level I evidence-based systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(5):1733–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07040-0