GROSS AND FUNCTIONAL MOTOR IMPAIRMENT IN CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i02.178Keywords:
Cerebral Palsy, Classification Systems, FunctionAbstract
Background: Cerebral palsy (CP) represents a group of permanent disorders of movement and posture, frequently accompanied by disturbances in sensation, cognition, communication, and behavior. Functional classification systems such as the Gross Motor Function Classification System–Expanded and Revised (GMFCS-E&R) and the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) provide standardized methods for assessing functional ability in children with CP. Understanding their correlation aids in comprehensive clinical assessment and rehabilitation planning. Objective: To determine the frequency of functional profiles of children with cerebral palsy based on GMFCS-E&R and MACS, and to evaluate the correlation between the two classification systems. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Settings: Department of Pediatrics, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, Pakistan. Duration of Study: February 2025 to May 2025. Methods: A total of 138 children diagnosed with cerebral palsy were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Each participant’s motor and manual abilities were classified using GMFCS-E&R and MACS, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs), and p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: The median (IQR) age of the participants was 6 (4) years. Based on GMFCS-E&R, 17 (16.7%) children were classified at level I, 27 (26.5%) at level II, 24 (23.5%) at level III, 28 (27.5%) at level IV, and 6 (5.8%) at level V. According to MACS, 25 (24.5%) were at level I, 44 (43.2%) at level II, 15 (14.7%) at level III, 14 (13.7%) at level IV, and 4 (3.9%) at level V. A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between GMFCS-E&R and MACS (rs = 0.623, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The majority of children with cerebral palsy demonstrated moderate functional impairment, predominantly classified within levels II–IV of both GMFCS-E&R and MACS. A strong positive correlation between the two systems underscores their concurrent validity and usefulness in multidisciplinary assessment and rehabilitation planning for children with CP.
References
Majnemer A, Shikako-Thomas K, Shevell M, Poulin C, Lach L, Law M, et al. The relationship between manual ability and ambulation in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33(2):243–252. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2012.754394
Saleh M, Almasri NA. Cerebral palsy in Jordan: demographics, medical characteristics, and access to services. Child Health Care. 2017;46(1):49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02739615.2015.1124770
Martinec S, Cesarec G, Krilić AM, Radošević T, Bakran Ž, Bošnjak VM. Functional classification of children with cerebral palsy in Krapina-Zagorje County. Acta Clin Croat. 2021;60(2):282–289. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.02.15
Rauchenzauner M, Schiller K, Honold M, Baldissera I, Biedermann R, Tschiderer B, et al. Visual impairment and functional classification in children with cerebral palsy. Neuropediatr. 2021;52(5):383–389. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722679
Franjoine MR, Darr N, Young B, McCoy SW, LaForme Fiss A. Examination of the effects of age, sex, and motor ability level on balance capabilities in children with cerebral palsy GMFCS levels I, II, III and typical development using the Pediatric Balance Scale. Dev Neurorehabil. 2022;25(2):115–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2021.1943033
Virella D, Pennington L, Andersen GL, Andrada MD, Greitane A, Himmelmann K, et al. Classification systems of communication for use in epidemiological surveillance of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(3):285–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12866
Almasri NA, Saleh M, Abu-Dahab S, Malkawi SH, Nordmark E. Functional profiles of children with cerebral palsy in Jordan based on the association between gross motor function and manual ability. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1257-x
Piscitelli D, Ferrarello F, Ugolini A, Verola S, Pellicciari L. Measurement properties of the GMFCS, GMFCS-E&R, MACS, and CFCS in cerebral palsy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021;63(11):1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14910
Yun G, Huang M, Cao J, Hu X. Selective motor control correlates with gross motor ability, functional balance and gait performance in ambulant children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2023;99:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.10.009
Huroy M, Behlim T, Andersen J, Buckley D, Fehlings D, Kirton A, et al. Stability of the Gross Motor Function Classification System over time in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(12):1487–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15375
Burgess A, Reedman S, Chatfield MD, Ware RS, Sakzewski L, Boyd RN. Development of gross motor capacity and mobility performance in children with cerebral palsy: a longitudinal study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(5):578–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15112
Dar H, Stewart K, McIntyre S, Paget S. Multiple motor disorders in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024;66(3):317–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15730
Rosdiana I, Ariestiani A. The correlation between gross motor function classification system and spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. J Adv Multidiscip Res. 2021;2(2):70–77. https://doi.org/10.30659/JAMR.2.2.70-77
Bekteshi S, Monbaliu E, McIntyre S, Saloojee G, Hilberink SR, Tatishvili N, et al. Towards functional improvement of motor disorders associated with cerebral palsy. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(3):229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00004-2
MacWilliams BA, Prasad S, Shuckra AL, Schwartz MH. Causal factors affecting gross motor function in children diagnosed with cerebral palsy. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0270121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270121
Pavão SL, Lima CR, Rocha NA. Association between sensory processing and activity performance in children with cerebral palsy levels I–II on the gross motor function classification system. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(2):194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.05.007
Himmelmann K, Beckung E, Hagberg G, Uvebrant P. Gross and fine motor function and accompanying impairments in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(6):417–423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206000922
Mutlu A, Pistav-Akmese P, Yardımcı BN, Ogretmen T. What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us? J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(12):3493–3498. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3493
Compagnone E, Maniglio J, Camposeo S, Vespino T, Losito L, De Rinaldis M, et al. Functional classifications for cerebral palsy: correlations between the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) and the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS). Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2651–2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 . RACHANA, AH RADHAN , ZA QAMBRANI , KB KHOSO , F SHAIKH , S AHMED

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.