SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF CLASSICAL VS MINI LAPAROTOMY CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR SYMPTOMATIC GALLSTONE DISEASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i02.186Keywords:
Mini Laparotomy Cholecystectomy, Classical Cholecystectomy, Gallstone Disease, Discharge Criteria, Hospital StayAbstract
Background: Gallstone disease is one of the most common surgical conditions worldwide, traditionally managed by open cholecystectomy. With advancements in surgical techniques, mini laparotomy cholecystectomy has emerged as a less invasive alternative that may shorten hospital stay and enhance recovery without compromising safety. Objective: To compare the discharge criteria of patients undergoing classical versus mini laparotomy cholecystectomy within 48 hours of surgery. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of General Surgery, Mercy Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan. Duration of Study: From 05-12-2024 to 05-05-2025. Methods: Ninety-four patients with symptomatic gallstones were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (n=47) underwent mini cholecystectomy through a 3–5 cm subcostal incision, while Group B (n=47) underwent classical cholecystectomy through an 8–12 cm incision. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients fulfilling discharge criteria within 48 hours postoperatively, defined as tolerating oral intake, passing stools, having no respiratory issues, a clean wound, no further need for analgesia, and full mobility. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the mini cholecystectomy group (83.0%) met all discharge criteria within 48 hours compared to the classical cholecystectomy group (61.7%) (p = 0.02). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the mini cholecystectomy group (1.91 ± 0.69 days) than in the classical cholecystectomy group (2.45 ± 0.88 days). Conclusion: Mini laparotomy cholecystectomy demonstrated superior short-term outcomes compared to classical laparotomy, with earlier fulfillment of discharge criteria and shorter hospital stays. It represents a safe and effective alternative for the management of symptomatic gallstones, particularly in resource-limited settings.
References
Thamer SJ. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of gallstone disease: a brief review. Basic Clin Sci. 2022;1(2):70–7. https://doi.org/10.48112/bcs.v1i2.99
Schirmer BD, Winters KL, Edlich RF. Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15(3):329–38. https://doi.org/10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i3.90
Mannam R, Sankara Narayanan R, Bansal A, Yanamaladoddi VR, Sarvepalli SS, Vemula SL, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a literature review. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45704. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45704
Zhao JJ, Syn NL, Chong C, Tan HL, Ng JY, Yap A, et al. Comparative outcomes of needlescopic, single-incision laparoscopic, standard laparoscopic, mini-laparotomy, and open cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 96 randomized controlled trials with 11,083 patients. Surgery. 2021;170(4):994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.053
Warchałowski Ł, Łuszczki E, Bartosiewicz A, Dereń K, Warchałowska M, Oleksy Ł, et al. The analysis of risk factors in the conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7571. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207571
Chattopadhyay K, Das R. Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Int J Surg Sci. 2020;4(1):427–30. https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2020.v4.i1h.375
Bashir SI, Mohamed RB, Owish KA, Abdalla AM, Abdullah AM, Ali YB. Mini-laparotomy for cholecystectomy in resource-limited settings: a 10-year retrospective hospital-based study. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;42:1–8. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.42.304.32681
Shulutko A, Kazaryan A, Agadzhanov V. Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: technique, outcomes: a prospective study. Int J Surg. 2007;5(6):423–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.07.004
Adam ME, Idris SA. Open minimally invasive cholecystectomy in Khartoum North Teaching Hospital, Sudan. Sch J App Med Sci. 2014;2(1):121–4. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2014.v02i01.0023
Singla S, Singla M, Singla S, Thami G, Mallik P, Aggarwal N. Comparative analysis of muscle-splitting versus muscle-dividing incision in open cholecystectomy. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015;4(93):15896–8. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2015/2310
Saeed N, Nasir T, Burki B, Channa GA. Mini-cholecystectomy: a feasible option. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(3):68–70. [No DOI found]
Handaya AY, Andrew J, Hanif AS, Tjendra KR, Aditya AFK. Effectiveness and predictors of conversion in mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy in a developing country: a cohort retrospective study. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):344. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01792-9
Shakil F, Jalil M, Umer W, Faiz MS. Frequency of various factors that lead to conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2025;75(3):491–4. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i3.11029
Amin A, Haider MI, Aamir IS, Khan MS, Khalid-Choudry U, Amir M, et al. Preoperative and operative risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy in Pakistan. Cureus. 2019;11(8):e5446. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5446
Lee NW, Collins J, Britt R, Britt LD. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors for converting laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 2012;78(8):831–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481207800815
Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Small-incision versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD004788. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004788.pub2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Z AHMAD , M SADIQ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


