COMPARISON OF POSTOPERATIVE CARDIAC ENZYME LEVELS IN ON-PUMP VERSUS OFF-PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i02.192Keywords:
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; On-Pump CABG; Off-Pump CABG; Cardiac Enzymes; Troponin; CK-MB; Myocardial InjuryAbstract
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a fundamental procedure for myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease. The two principal surgical approaches, on-pump CABG (ONCAB), which utilizes cardiopulmonary bypass, and off-pump CABG (OPCAB), performed on a beating heart, differ markedly in their physiological effects on myocardial tissue. Postoperative cardiac biomarkers, including CK-MB, Troponin I, and Troponin T, serve as sensitive indicators of perioperative myocardial injury. Objective: To compare postoperative cardiac enzyme levels between ONCAB and OPCAB procedures and determine the relative extent of myocardial injury associated with each technique. Study Design: Non-randomized controlled trial. Settings: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore, Pakistan. Duration of Study: 11 April to 11 July 2025. Methods: Sixty-eight patients undergoing elective CABG were enrolled using non-probability, consecutive sampling, and allocated equally to the ONCAB and OPCAB groups. Baseline demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and body mass index were documented. Serum CK-MB, Troponin I, and Troponin T levels were measured preoperatively and at 1, 4, and 8 hours postoperatively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests were applied, with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of participants was 58.4 ± 6.8 years, and 79.4% were male. Common comorbidities included hypertension (61.8%), diabetes mellitus (55.9%), and hyperlipidemia (45.6%). Baseline enzyme values were statistically comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Postoperatively, mean CK-MB, Troponin I, and Troponin T levels at 1, 4, and 8 hours were significantly higher in the ONCAB group than in the OPCAB group (p < 0.001 for all). Stratified analysis revealed no significant influence of age, gender, BMI, or comorbidities on enzyme elevation, indicating procedure-related differences. Conclusion: On-pump CABG was associated with significantly greater postoperative elevation of cardiac enzymes compared with off-pump surgery, reflecting higher myocardial injury linked to cardiopulmonary bypass. The off-pump approach may thus offer superior myocardial protection and should be considered where technically feasible, particularly in high-risk populations with prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities in Pakistan.
References
Rahman M., Farogh A., Iftikhar S., Ahmad N., Bashir G., Mahmood H.et al.. Comparison of post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing on-pump versus off-pump CABG. PJMHS 2021;15(11):3098-3100. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2115113098
Guan Z., Guan X., Gu K., Lin X., Lin J., Zhou W.et al.. Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2020;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01115-0
Deppe A., Arbash W., Kuhn E., Slottosch I., Scherner M., Liakopoulos O.et al.. Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16,900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2015;49(4):1031-1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv268
Puskas J., Martin J., Cheng D., Benussi S., Bonatti J., Diegeler A.et al.. Ismics consensus conference and statements of randomized controlled trials of off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass surgery. Innovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery 2015;10(4):219-229. https://doi.org/10.1097/imi.0000000000000184
Phothikun A., Nawarawong W., Tantraworasin A., Phinyo P., & Tepsuwan T.. The outcomes of three different techniques of coronary artery bypass grafting: on-pump arrested heart, on-pump beating heart, and off-pump. Plos One 2023;18(5):e0286510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286510
Eriş C., Erdolu B., Engin M., AS A., & Üstündağ Y.. The effects of aortic clamping strategy on myocardial protection and early postoperative outcomes during coronary artery bypass grafting operations. The Heart Surgery Forum 2021;24(2): E217-E222. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.3475
Jongman R., Zijlstra J., Kok W., Harten A., Mariani M., Moser J.et al.. Off-pump CABG surgery reduces systemic inflammation compared with on-pump surgery but does not change systemic endothelial responses. Shock 2014;42(2):121-128. https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0000000000000190
Mirhafez S., Khadem S., Sahebkar A., Movahedi A., Rahsepar A., Mirzaie A.et al.. Comparative effects of on‐pump versus off‐pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery on serum cytokine and chemokine levels. Iubmb Life 2021;73(12):1423-1431. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.2566
BAYRAM H., Zor M., Erer D., İriz E., & Özdoğan M. On-pump cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: renal and liver function tests. Gazi Medical Journal 2016;27(1). https://doi.org/10.12996/gmj.2016.01
Khan M., Khan A., Khalil , Khan S., Shah H., & Khan H. Effect of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft on length of ICU stay among low ejection fraction patients going through cardiac revascularization. JHRR 2024;4(1):1484-1489. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.575
Ullah K., Waseem M., Janjua A., Khadim S., Amin M., Ashfaq M.et al.. Comparison of cardiac troponin-I levels in the postoperative period of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal 2021;70(Suppl-4): S849-54. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v70isuppl-4.6042
Yu R., Song H., Bi Y., & Meng X.. Predictive role of the neutrophil: lymphocyte Ratio in acute kidney injury associated with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Frontiers in Surgery 2022;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1047050
Ullah K., Waseem M., Janjua A., Khadim S., Amin M., Ashfaq M.et al.. Comparison of cardiac troponin-I levels in the postoperative period of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal 2021;70(Suppl-4): S849-54. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v70isuppl-4.6042
Kılıç Y., Jalalzai I., Sönmez E., & Erkut B.. Comparison of on-pump beating heart surgery versus conventional bypass surgery in patients with acute myocardial infarction requiring urgent revascularization. The Heart Surgery Forum 2024;27(3): E271-E281. https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7203
Eriş C., Erdolu B., Engin M., AS A., & Üstündağ Y.. The effects of aortic clamping strategy on myocardial protection and early postoperative outcomes during coronary artery bypass grafting operations. The Heart Surgery Forum 2021;24(2): E217-E222. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.3475
Mahrose R., Shorbagy M., Shahin K., & Al-Elwany S.. Warm blood cardioplegia versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with low ejection fraction. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology 2020;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-020-00069-8
Atasoy M., Müdüroğlu A., Güven H., Yüksel A., Kumtepe G., Badem S.et al.. Perioperative myocardial injury following off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery: a prospective single-blind comparative study. Azerbaijan Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2025;6(2):31. https://doi.org/10.5455/azjcvs.2024.12.026
Abdo A., Gamil E., Farrag K., & Housieny M.. Short–term outcome of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Al-Azhar International Medical Journal 2022;0(0):0-0. https://doi.org/10.21608/aimj.2022.102280.1622
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 . NASRATULLAH, W RIAZ , BZ MIRZA , M NOOR, MB IQBAL , H ZEYAD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


