DEEP TENSION SUTURES VERSUS INTERRUPTED FIGURE OF 8 SUTURES FOR CLOSURE OF THE RECTUS SHEATH IN TERMS OF WOUND DEHISCENCE IN COMPLICATED ABDOMINAL SURGERIES

Authors

  • . ABDULLAH Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital, Gujrat, Pakistan
  • A NAZIR Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital, Gujrat, Pakistan
  • . SAJIDURREHMAN Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital, Gujrat, Pakistan
  • W AHMED Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital, Gujrat, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i02.228

Keywords:

Deep Tension Sutures; Figure-Of-Eight Sutures; Rectus Sheath Closure; Wound Dehiscence; Abdominal Surgery; Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Wound dehiscence remains a serious postoperative complication following abdominal surgery, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and higher healthcare costs. The risk is particularly elevated in emergency and contaminated surgical settings. Optimizing rectus sheath closure techniques may reduce the incidence of this complication. Objective: To compare deep tension sutures with interrupted figure-of-eight sutures for rectus sheath closure in terms of postoperative wound dehiscence in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Surgery, Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital, Gujrat. Duration of Study: Three months from 6th March 2025 to 6th June 2025. Methods: A total of 100 patients undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy were randomly allocated into two groups: deep tension sutures (n = 50) and interrupted figure-of-eight sutures (n = 50) for rectus sheath closure. Postoperative assessment for fascial wound dehiscence was conducted clinically and ultrasonographically on postoperative days 3, 7, 10, 14, and 21. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 28. The chi-square test was applied to compare proportions, with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Fascial wound dehiscence occurred in 6.0% of patients in the deep tension suture group compared with 26.0% in the figure-of-eight group (χ² = 7.44, p = 0.006). The mean defect size was significantly smaller in the deep tension group (0.7 ± 0.3 cm) than in the figure-of-eight group (1.9 ± 0.6 cm; p < 0.001). Post-stratification analysis demonstrated significantly lower dehiscence rates with deep tension sutures among high-risk subgroups, including patients with diabetes, hypertension, smoking history, and advanced age. Conclusion: Deep tension suturing significantly reduces both the incidence and severity of rectus sheath wound dehiscence compared with interrupted figure-of-eight sutures, particularly in high-risk emergency abdominal surgeries. This technique represents a simple, effective, and cost-efficient strategy for improving surgical outcomes in resource-limited settings.

References

Shashikala V, Abhilash S, Abhishek G, Fernandes P. A comparative study between continuous and X-interrupted sutures in emergency midline laparotomies. Int Surg J. 2018;5(5):1753. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181437

Shukla A, Gautam A, Shrivastava S, Arora S, Singh R, Athya R, et al. Herringbone stitch technique versus interrupted suturing technique for rectus closure in emergency laparotomy: A comparative study. Asian J Med Sci. 2024;15(4):244-247. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i4.62022

Bansiwal R, Mittal T, Sharma R, Gupta S, Singh S, Kumar A, et al. Comparative study of abdominal wound dehiscence in continuous versus interrupted fascial closure after emergency midline laparotomy. Int Surg J. 2019;6(3):886. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20190819

Shahid M, Mahmoud F, Elmallah S. Evaluation of a new technique for abdominal wall closure in midline laparotomies. Int Surg J. 2018;5(8):2701. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20183188

Songara B. Comparison of suture technique (interrupted vs continuous) with respect to wound dehiscence. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2019;7(2). https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i2.07

Theodorou A, Banysch M, Gök H, Deerenberg E, Kalff J, Websky M. Don’t fear the (small) bite: A narrative review of the rationale and misconceptions surrounding closure of abdominal wall incisions. Front Surg. 2022;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1002558

Garg S, Yadav M, Singhal K. A clinical comparative study of rectus sheath closure techniques in emergency exploratory laparotomy: Evaluating “far-near-near-far” vs conventional closure approach. Cureus. 2023. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45655

Balaji C, Neogi S, Ramasamy S, Vats M. Comparison of interrupted-X technique closure versus conventional continuous closure of rectus sheath: A randomized control study. Int Surg J. 2019;6(9):3233. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20194057

Khan T, Jaffer Z, Ullah R, Malik A, Hayat A, Hayat Q. Effectiveness of continuous versus interrupted closure of midline wound in emergency laparotomies in terms of wound dehiscence. JHRR. 2024;4(1):1102-1107. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.564

Fukai S, Mizusawa Y, Noda H, Tsujinaka S, Maeda Y, Hasebe R, et al. Superiority trial for the Development of an ideal method for the closure of midline abdominal wall incisions to reduce the incidence of wound complications after elective gastroenterological surgery: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024;25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08167-w

Charif M, Hassan Z, Hoballah J, Khalife M, Sbaity E. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound complications in elective midline laparotomies after fascia closure using two different techniques of running sutures: COFACTOR trial. Trials. 2020;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04507-8

Naveed M, Hassan M, Ashraf M, Khan R, Khan F, Ara J. Outcome of prophylactic Bogota bag application in midline laparotomy wound closure versus retention en masse closure using Prolene sutures in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. PJMHS. 2022;16(2):26-27. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2216226

Shankar A, Mathew S, Tippana V, B R K, Naik S, Pandita R, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing clinical equivalence of PD Synth and PDS polydioxanone sutures. Cureus. 2023. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50293

Vardhini K, Kishan D. Incidence and risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in cases of burst abdomen after emergency and elective midline laparotomies. Int Surg J. 2018;5(11):3471. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20184611

Dilday J, McGillen P, Park S, Gallagher S, Lee H, Schellenberg M, et al. Is barbed better? Evaluation of triclosan-coated barbed suture on wound complications following emergency laparotomy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024;97(1):149-157. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000004341

Kumar D. Preemptive deep tension suturing in prevention of burst abdomen. JPTCP. 2022. https://doi.org/10.53555/yw5k0846

Afridi S, Yousaf M, Sharif G, Mehmood A, Khan M, Waheed D. Internal tension sutures in terms of wound healing in patients undergoing laparotomy. PJMHS. 2021;15(8):2381-2383. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs211582381

Sharma A, Gupta A, Singh N, Maurya A, Singla M. Comparison of continuous versus interrupted abdominal fascia closure using polydioxanone suture in laparotomy. Int Surg J. 2019;6(8):2832. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20193326

Modi J, Patel Y, Trivedi M, Bochiya G. Abdominal wound dehiscence after emergency explorative laparotomy and its management at a tertiary care centre: An observational study. Int Surg J. 2023;10(9):1448-1454. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20232500

Parsa H, Maghsoudi L, Mohammadzadeh A, Hosseini M. Evaluation of risk factors in fascia dehiscence after abdominal surgeries. Ann Med Surg. 2024;86(9):4984-4989. https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002335

Tang H, Liu D, Qi H, Zeping L, Zhang X, Jiang D, et al. Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery. Chin J Traumatol. 2018;21(1):20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.08.008

Teklewold B, Pioth D, Dana T. Magnitude of abdominal wound dehiscence and associated factors of patients who underwent abdominal operation at St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Surg Res Pract. 2020;2020:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1379738

Alamdari N, Shams F, Hajimirzaie S, Besharat S, Fathi M, Farsi Y, et al. Comparing simple interrupted vs continuous fascial closure methods in elective midline laparotomy: A randomized controlled trial. 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2847426/v1

Pai D, Shenoy R, Chethan K. Comparison of non-absorbable (polypropylene) versus delayed absorbable (polydioxanone) suture material for abdominal wound closure after laparotomy. Int Surg J. 2018;5(5):1690. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181404

Hempel S, Kalauch A, Oehme F, Wolk S, Welsch T, Weitz J, et al. Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse, and modified Makuuchi incisions. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(20):e25989. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000025989

Ross C, Miyake B, Marsh H, Bryant P, Lee C, Barreiro G. The lasso suture: Ex vivo testing of an alternative to the high-tension deep dermal stitch. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(5):862e-866e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000010391

Downloads

Published

2025-07-18

How to Cite

ABDULLAH, ., NAZIR , A., SAJIDURREHMAN, ., & AHMED, W. (2025). DEEP TENSION SUTURES VERSUS INTERRUPTED FIGURE OF 8 SUTURES FOR CLOSURE OF THE RECTUS SHEATH IN TERMS OF WOUND DEHISCENCE IN COMPLICATED ABDOMINAL SURGERIES. Pakistan Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 5(02), 228. https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i02.228

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles