COMPARISON OF POST-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL STAY IN PERIUMBILICAL AND INTRAUMBILICAL INCISION IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

ZU REHMAN; U FAIZ; B BIBI; MH KHAN; AB  KHAN

doi:10.54112/pjicm.v5i01.77

Authors

ZU REHMAN Department of General Surgery, Saidu Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Swat, Pakistan
U FAIZ Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, Pakistan
B BIBI Department of General Surgery, Health Inn Medical Centre, Pakistan
MH KHAN Jinnah Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan
AB KHAN Bacha Khan Medical College/Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i01.77

Keywords:

Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Intraumbilical Incision, Periumbilical Incision, Postoperative Outcomes, Surgical Complications.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a common surgical procedure, and the choice of umbilical incision type may influence postoperative recovery. While intraumbilical (IU) and periumbilical (PU) incisions are both widely used, comparative evidence regarding their impact on hospital stay and patient outcomes remains limited. Objective: To compare the postoperative hospital stay between intraumbilical and periumbilical incisions in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Study Design: Comparative study. Setting: Department of General Surgery, Saidu Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Swat, Pakistan. Duration of Study: July 2024 to January 2025. Methods: A total of 150 patients aged 18 years and above undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (n = 75) received intraumbilical (IU) incisions, while Group B (n = 75) underwent periumbilical (PU) incisions. Standardized laparoscopic techniques were used across both groups. IU incisions were made vertically within the umbilicus, and PU incisions were placed curvilinearly above or below the umbilicus. Primary outcome measured was length of postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included operative time and postoperative pain scores (measured using a visual analogue scale). Statistical analysis was performed using independent sample t-tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean hospital stay in Group A (IU) was 5.52 ± 0.87 days, compared to 5.55 ± 0.94 days in Group B (PU) (p = 0.85). Mean operative time was 86.40 ± 3.55 minutes in Group A and 86.32 ± 3.76 minutes in Group B (p = 0.89), indicating no significant difference. Pain scores were slightly higher in Group A (3.69 ± 0.91) than in Group B (3.40 ± 0.91), reaching borderline statistical significance (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Intraumbilical and periumbilical incisions yield comparable clinical outcomes in laparoscopic appendectomy, with no significant differences in hospital stay or operative time. Although pain scores were marginally higher in the intraumbilical group, both techniques can be safely and effectively utilized based on surgeon preference and patient-specific considerations.

References

Ferris M, Quan S, Kaplan BS, Molodecky N, Ball CG, Chernoff GW, Bhala N, Ghosh S, Dixon E, Ng S, Kaplan GG. The global incidence of appendicitis: a systematic review of population-based studies. Annals of surgery. 2017;266(2):237-41.

Catal O, Ozer B, Sit M, Erkol H. Is appendectomy a simple surgical procedure?. Cirugía y cirujanos. 2021;89(3):303-8.

Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MA, Abis GS, Acharya A, Ankersmit M, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surgical endoscopy. 2016;30:4668-90.

Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD, Catena F, Weber DG, Sartelli M, et al. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2016;11:1-25.

Bessoff KE, Choi J, Wolff CJ, Kashikar A, Carlos GM, Caddell L, Khan RI, Stave CD, Spain DA, Forrester JD. Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic appendectomy: A stepwise systematic review. Surgery Open Science. 2021;6:29-39.

Trunfio TA, Scala A, Giglio C, Rossi G, Borrelli A, Romano M, et al. Multiple regression model to analyze the total LOS for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2022;22(1):141.

Zollinger RM, Ellison EC, Zollinger RM. Zollinger's atlas of surgical operations. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2011.

Chow A, Purkayastha S, Nehme J, Darzi LA, Paraskeva P. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis. Surgical endoscopy. 2010;24:2567-74.

Kim HJ, Lee JI, Lee YS, Lee IK, Park JH, Lee SK, et al. Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases. Surgical endoscopy. 2010;24:2765-9.

Piskun G, Rajpal S. Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 1999;9(4):361-4.

Esposito C. One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surgical endoscopy. 1998;12:177-8.

Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. International journal of colorectal disease. 2008;23:1013-6.

Lee M, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Yim GW, Kim S, Kim YT. Single-port laparoscopic surgery is applicable to most gynecologic surgery: a single surgeon’s experience. Surgical endoscopy. 2012;26:1318-24.

Athar S, Hiraj MOR, Aleem A, Hussain A, Haider M, Hiraj M. Comparing the Intraumbilical and Periumbilical Incision in Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Med Forum. 2022;33(11):72-75.

Khan MA, Gul H, Nizami SM. Comparison of Periumbilical versus Intraumbilical Incision in Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Med Forum. 2019;30(5):16-19.

Lee JS, Hong TH, Kim JG. A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012;83(6):360-366.

Maity B, Ghosh S, Datta S, Roy S, Mozaffar M, Chowdhuri A, et al. Comparative study between outcomes of the periumbilical and intraumbilical incisions in laparoscopic procedures. Eur J Cardiovasc Med. 2023;13(3):2180-2188