SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CONCURRENT RADIOTHERAPY AND CETUXIMAB CHEMOTHERAPY VS RADIOTHERAPY ALONE FOR AGGRESSIVE SQUAMOUS CELL SKIN CANCER OF THE HEAD AND NECK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i01.78Keywords:
Carcinoma, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Squamous Cell CarcinomaAbstract
Background: Aggressive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck presents a therapeutic challenge due to its high recurrence and progression rates. While radiotherapy is a standard postoperative treatment, the addition of concurrent chemotherapy may enhance outcomes by improving locoregional control and overall survival. Cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing the therapeutic response in head and neck cancers. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent radiotherapy and cetuximab chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone in the treatment of aggressive squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Study Design: Retrospective comparative study. Setting: Oncology Department, Nishtar Hospital, Multan, Pakistan. Duration of Study: February 2023 to February 2025. Methods: A total of 200 adult patients with histologically confirmed aggressive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgical resection were included through consecutive sampling. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n=100) received concurrent radiotherapy (average dose: 60 Gy in 2–2.25 Gy fractions) and cetuximab chemotherapy (400 mg/m² initial dose followed by 250 mg/m² weekly), and Group B (n=100) received radiotherapy alone. Key outcomes included local and metastatic recurrence rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and t-tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Local Non-Recurrence Rates: 1-year: 92% (Group A) vs. 94% (Group B); 2-year: 84% vs. 75%. Metastatic Non-Recurrence Rates: 1-year: 98% vs. 100%; 2-year: 94% vs. 89%. Progression-Free Survival: 1-year: 85% vs. 76%; 2-year: 73% vs. 55%. Overall Survival: 1-year: 99% (Group A) vs. 80% (Group B); 2-year: 79% vs. 74%. Adverse Events: Grade 3 dermatitis occurred in 15% of Group A and 30% of Group B patients. Conclusion: Concurrent radiotherapy with cetuximab chemotherapy demonstrated improved 2-year progression-free and overall survival in patients with aggressive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to radiotherapy alone, with an acceptable safety profile. These findings support the use of combined modality treatment for better clinical outcomes.
References
Fania L, Didona D, Di Pietro FR, Verkhovskaia S, Morese R, Paolino G, et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: from pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches. Biomedicines. 2021;9(2):171.
Baggi A, Quaglino P, Rubatto M, Depenni R, Guida M, Ascierto PA, et al. Real world data of cemiplimab in locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. European Journal of Cancer. 2021;157:250-8.
Xing DT, Khor R, Gan H, Wada M, Ermongkonchai T, Ng SP. Recent research on combination of radiotherapy with targeted therapy or immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a review for radiation oncologists. Cancers. 2021;13(22):5716.
Naruse T, Furukawa K, Miyoshi T, Morishita K, Otsuru M, Umeda M. Complete response of recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy: A case series. Oncology Letters. 2022;24(6):431.
Kreinbrink PJ, Mierzwa ML, Huth B, Redmond KP, Wise‐Draper TM, Casper K, et al. Adjuvant radiation and cetuximab improves local control in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Phase II study. Head & Neck. 2021;43(11):3408-16.
Marin-Acevedo JA, Withycombe BM, Kim Y, Brohl AS, Eroglu Z, Markowitz J, et al. Cetuximab for immunotherapy-refractory/ineligible cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers. 2023;15(12):3180.
Tao Y, Biau J, Sun X, Sire C, Martin L, Alfonsi M, et al. Pembrolizumab versus cetuximab concurrent with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck unfit for cisplatin (GORTEC 2015-01 PembroRad): a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial. Annals of Oncology. 2023;34(1):101-10.
Chang M, Samlowski W, Meoz R. Effectiveness and toxicity of cetuximab with concurrent RT in locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell skin cancer: a case series. Oncotarget. 2023;14:709.
Yamauchi M, Sato Y, Ishida T, Minesaki A, Shimazaki E, Kuratomi Y. Cetuximab Plus Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. in vivo. 2023;37(5):2224-8.
Rawat S, Jain RK, Verma C. Cetuximab concurrent with radiotherapy in unresectable, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: real-world evidence from a Tertiary Care Hospital. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2022;74(Suppl 2):1857-63.
Chillari F, Parisi S, Ferrantelli G, Carrubba C, Santacaterina A, Critelli P, et al. Concurrent simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy and cetuximab in head and neck squamous cell cancer patients: is it feasible in daily clinical practice? Recenti Progressi in Medicina. 2024;115(5):1e-6e.
Otsuru M, Yanamoto S, Yamada S-i, Nakashiro K, Harazono Y, Kohgo T, et al. Radiotherapy Plus Cetuximab for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 79 Patients in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(5):4545.
Li Y, Yang C, Gan Y, Lu F, Qin Y. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2023;280(1):11-22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A BASHIR , MJ HASSAN , F NASIR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.