PROGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CEREBROPLACENTAL RATIO FOR ADVERSE FETAL OUTCOMES AND FETAL DISTRESS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BIRTH

S MUSHTAQ; M AMIN; MMUR KHAN

doi:10.54112/pjicm.v5i01.86

Authors

S MUSHTAQ Department of Radiology, Nishtar Medical University and Hospital Multan, Pakistan
M AMIN Department of Radiology, Ch.Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology Multan, Pakistan
MMUR KHAN Department of General Surgery, Nishtar Medical University and Hospital Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i01.86

Keywords:

Cerebroplacental Ratio, Fetuses, Fetal Compromise, Pregnancy

Abstract

Background: The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), derived from Doppler indices of the fetal middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery, has emerged as a potential predictor of fetal compromise. Evaluating its prognostic accuracy for adverse perinatal outcomes (APO) and cesarean section for intrapartum fetal distress (CS-IFR) may enhance perinatal risk stratification and decision-making in late gestation. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the cerebroplacental ratio for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes and cesarean section due to fetal distress within 24 hours of delivery. Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Radiology and Gynaecology Departments, Nishtar Hospital, Multan, Pakistan. Duration of Study: Twelve months, from April 2024 to April 2025. Methods: A total of 200 pregnant women between 31 and 41 weeks of gestation were included. All participants underwent fetal ultrasound assessment for estimated fetal weight, amniotic fluid volume, and Doppler evaluation of the umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA). The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) was calculated as the MCA pulsatility index divided by the UA pulsatility index. Neonatal outcomes were recorded within 24 hours of delivery. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and multiple regression analysis to determine the association between CPR and adverse outcomes. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CPR were calculated. Results: Patients with elevated UA pulsatility index and higher UA-PI multiples of the median showed a significantly higher incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes (p = 0.009). Multiple regression analysis identified labor induction (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.019–6.11, p < 0.05) and CPR multiples of the median (OR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.0071–0.3261, p < 0.001) as independent predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes. CPR showed a specificity of 70%, PPV of 32%, and NPV of 94% for predicting APO. For predicting CS-IFR, CPR had a specificity of 79%, a PPV of 26%, and NPV of 98%. Conclusion: The cerebroplacental ratio is a strong and reliable predictor of adverse perinatal outcomes and cesarean delivery for fetal distress in term pregnancies. Its high negative predictive value suggests utility in identifying low-risk pregnancies and informing delivery planning.

References

Choi S, Gordon A, Hilder L, Henry A, Hyett J, Brew B, et al. Performance of six birth‐weight and estimated‐fetal‐weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10‐year nationwide population‐based study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2021;58(2):264-277.

Ashkar Majadla N, Abu Shqara R, Frank Wolf M, Tuma R, Lowenstein L, Odeh M. The role of the cerebroplacental ratio in predicting pregnancy outcomes at 40–42 gestational weeks: a prospective observational trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2024;310(1):113-119.

Leavitt K, Odibo L, Nwosu O, Odibo AO. Comparing the cerebro-placental to umbilico-cerebral Doppler ratios for the prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2022;35(25):5904-5908.

Karge A, Lobmaier SM, Haller B, Kuschel B, Ortiz JU. Value of cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery doppler as predictors of adverse perinatal outcome in very small for gestational age at term fetuses. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(13):3852.

Novillo-Del Álamo B, Martínez-Varea A, Satorres-Pérez E, Nieto-Tous M, Bello-Martínez de Velasco S, García-Florenciano MV, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio as a predictive factor of emergency cesarean sections for intrapartum fetal compromise: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(6):1724.

Josten H, Heimann Y, Lehmann T, Schleußner E, Groten T, Weschenfelder F. The importance of the cerebro-placental ratio at term for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in appropriate for gestational age fetuses. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2024(0).

Vollgraff Heidweiller‐Schreurs C, Van Osch I, Heymans MW, Ganzevoort W, Schoonmade L, Bax C, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2021;128(2):226-235.

Morales-Roselló J, Loscalzo G, Jakaitė V, Perales Marín A. The diagnostic ability of the cerebroplacental ratio for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome and intrapartum fetal compromise within one day of delivery. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2021;86(4):343-352.

Coenen H, Braun J, Köster H, Möllers M, Schmitz R, Steinhard J, et al. Role of umbilicocerebral and cerebroplacental ratios in prediction of perinatal outcome in FGR pregnancies. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2023:1-10.

Mohamed ML, Mohamed SA, Elshahat AM. Cerebroplacental ratio for prediction of adverse intrapartum and neonatal outcomes in a term uncomplicated pregnancy. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2021;26:1-10.

Di Mascio D, Herraiz I, Villalain C, Buca D, Morales-Rossello J, Loscalzo G, et al. Comparison between cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by late fetal growth restriction: a multicenter, retrospective study. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2021;48(6):448-456.

Winchester M-L, McCarther N, Cancino D, Fitzgerald S, Parrish M. Second trimester cerebroplacental ratio versus umbilicocerebral ratio for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2022;35(25):7929-7935.

Bonnevier A, Maršál K, Brodszki J, Thuring A, Källén K. Cerebroplacental ratio as predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in the third trimester. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2021;100(3):497-503.

Morales‐Roselló J, Bhate R, Eltaweel N, Khalil A. Comparison of ductus venosus Doppler and cerebroplacental ratio for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in high‐risk pregnancies before and after 34 weeks. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2023;102(7):891-904.

Perumal S, Andrew C. Cerebroplacental Ratio Percentile: A Predictor of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome. Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2023;15(4):445-450.